27.02.2018 | Is Telegram's ICO even an ICO?

27.02.2018 | Is Telegram's ICO even an ICO?

A $US2 billion ICO deserves some careful thought.

27 February 2018 · 1 min read

  • Published 27 February, 2018

When you buy a coin in an Initial Coin Offering, you are buying a digital asset that will be useful when the organisation who issued the coin builds the crypto-network they say they will.

Hopefully.

Unlike shares, they don’t mean you own a percentage of the organisation. They are just the future mechanisms by which the crypto-project will run.

ICOs have been fabulously helpful to crypto startups who need money to develop their projects (when they can’t get the money from banks).

There’s no guarantee the project will work, (or is even legal) but this is tech! There’s gotta be a bit of risk!

A thriving market has sprung up because people are swapping these coins with each other, despite few projects actually nearing completion (yet).

But for some, the size of some of these raisings is getting a bit ridiculous.

Telegram - a messaging app that has a wildly active, crypto-mad population - has just raised $US850 million by issuing tokens called GRAMs.

The company is hoping to develop a blockchain that runs smart contracts, similar to Ethereum, that offers remote file storage, anonymous browsing and micropayments for all kinds of services.

The 200 million existing users would transact on this not-yet-developed blockchain, called the Telegram Open Network, using GRAMs. (The whitepaper is here.)

So far, Telegram has only issued tokens to private investors, who happen to include venture capital heavyweights Sequoia Capital and Benchmark.

But apparently $US850 million is not enough to develop the Telegram Open Network, and the founders Pavel and Nikolai Durov have decided to raise another $US1.15 billion. Privately.

Which sounds a lot like a regular old venture capital raising, except instead of the VC funds getting slices of the company, they are receiving GRAMs.

Telegram looks like it could have a valuation in excess of $US2 billion, making it the largest ICO in history.

And it's posed the question, is this the new norm for large ICOs? Rather than subject themselves to the mercy of the pump-and-dump ICO traders, founders are heading back to the safety of private money?

We'd be interested to know your thoughts.

Enjoy your Tuesday.

The information in this article is prepared by Spaceship Capital Limited (ABN 67 621 011 649, AFSL 501605). It is general in nature as it has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs.


Jessica Sier is a financial journalist. Prior to that she led content at Spaceship and was a reporter at the AFR where she discovered that breaking down financial jargon was a public good.


Related articles

Feature image for 12.03.25 | May I have a word on the markets?

While it's never easy, it's important to remember that market volatility, while extremely unsettling, is a normal part of investing.

Bryna Howes

3 min read

Feature image for 24.01.25 | We bought and sold some stocks

See the latest changes to the Spaceship Voyager portfolios.

Bryna Howes

3 min read

Feature image for 16.08.24 | Here are the results of our Money Check In

More than 1,000 Aussies within the Spaceship community told us how they’re faring.

Bryna Howes

2 min read

Spaceship times

The money talk you didn't know you needed

Join thousands of Australians already in-the-know.


Invest in your future, so you can live the life you want to live

Get started in five minutes.